• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Yocheved Feinerman

Go With Yo

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About Yo
    • Portfolio
    • Say Hello

Blog

Go With Yo: Tel Aviv International Student Film Festival

June 17, 2022 by Yocheved Feinerman Leave a Comment

Go With Yo: Tel Aviv International Student Film Festival #24

On the Go

 

to

 

the Tel Aviv Cinematheque

 

for

 

the 24th Tel Aviv International Student Film Festival

 

 

 

 

 

 

Student Films: The Israeli Competition Program

 

Student Films: The Israeli Competition Program

 

I had the pleasure of viewing 5 of the 23 creations of male and female students from film schools all over the country. Each represents a personal point of view, an original story, an exposed truth evoking a rolling laugh or tear in the corner of the eye. Provides a glimpse into the inner world of the creators and the feeling of the new spirit of Israeli cinema.

 

Flora: Director and Screenwriter Yuval Naim

 

Want Coffee? Director and Screenwriter Hodaya Avraham

 

The Workshop for the Broken Hearted: Director and Screenwriter Roi Raveh Rubicek

 

One Last Visit: Director and Screenwriter Omer Manor

 

Adana and Yaleo: Director and Screenwriter Oz Zirlan

 

Who did I vote for?

 

Oz Zirlan’s “Adane and Yaleo”.

 

Synopsis: During an anxiety attack, a young Ethiopian- Israeli must rescue his brother from an encounter with the police.

 

 

Industry Events

 

How Do You Direct a Sex Scene?

 

Featuring a panel discussion by Directors Hagai Levi, Hagar Ben-Asher, and Intimacy Coordinator Erga Yaari.

 

How Do You Direct a Sex Scene (photos from Erga Yaari’s Facebook Page)

 

 How do you direct a sex scene? This is something I want to know.

A course not taught at my religious film school. When I read about it on Facebook, I set my Waze and headed to the TLV Cinematheque.

The packed theater and I were not disappointed. We learned that YES actors signed. YES, they agreed to everything. YES. YES. YES.

AND

We as filmmakers still have a responsibility

How can we create a safe environment?
1. closed sets
2. close extra monitors
3. write down specific choreography per beat of the scene
4. talk to your actors – use language such as “are you okay” or “does this feel right” and if they say no – stop.

That’s your job as a filmmaker — to listen. And then to problem solve. The inexperienced director believes that there will be no problems on set. And that everything will go according to plan. That everything will match her vision. The experienced director knows that there will be challenges – good moments that were unexpected as well as the bad. A professional director is a problem solver, a communicator, and most importantly, a leader.

Grateful for the opportunity to learn from the best.

How Do You Direct a Sex Scene (photos from Erga Yaari’s Facebook Page)

And

 

Excited and inspired! Safe sets with intimacy coordinators – like Erga Yaari.

Yaari explained that she sees her position on set as the mediator – the one that knows what the director wants – feels – envisions – and what the actors wish to – feel – envision. Sometimes, the male actor has terrible breath, making it uncomfortable for the actress to kiss him. Other times, the actor has never done what is typed in the script. The intimacy coordinator is a collaborator in the artistic process – the one that knows what is going too far — and what can go further.

I look forward to working with Erga Yaari, and other intimacy coordinators, on future productions.

How Do You Direct a Sex Scene (photo taken from Erga Yaari’s facebook page)

Masterclass

 

with Mia Hansen-Love

 

 

One of contemporary French Cinema’s most prominent voices, Mia Hansen-Love, strives for authenticity in her intrinsically humanistic films.

Over Corona, I had the opportunity to watch Bergman Island and was intrigued by the simplicity, the beauty, the humanity, the mystery, and the scenery. So I was very interested in hearing from the director. Mia Hansen-Love did not disappoint. She discussed her methods, from writing in French – to working with actors on making the dialogue sound natural and authentic – rolling off their tongues. I was intrigued by her description of pre-production acting out the different parts while plotting camera movements.

 

On my list — more of Mia Hansen-Love’s movies.

 

 

with Joey Soloway

 

I really – really wanted to hear Joey Soloway — the timing an hour and a half before Shabbat would be cutting it too close? Do I still have time? Today at 4:30 pm.

 

Looking forward to next year!

 

Special thanks to the festival team, for inviting us to take part in the rich and varied cinematic experience.

Filed Under: Blog, Film School Tagged With: filmfestival, filmstudent, tel aviv, tel aviv international student film festival 2022

James’ Journey to Jerusalem: A Film Review

June 17, 2022 by Yocheved Feinerman 2 Comments

We Journey to Jerusalem

I know what you are thinking, how could the protagonist in Director Ra’anan Alexandrowicz‘s movie, a 24-year-old preacher from the imaginary village of Entshongwen, be me, a 41-year-old filmmaker, suburban wife, and mom. We don’t look alike – we are of different genders. We were born in other parts of the world. We pray to a different G-d. We wear different clothes. Listen to different music. 

And yet – I am James, and James is me. Who is this “James” I keep referring to, you ask. 

Meet James, the Pilgrim

James (Siyabonga Melongisi Shibe), the protagonist of James’ Journey to Jerusalem, is the son of a Zulu preacher and the next in line to become a pastor, sent from his African village to pilgrimage to the holy city of Jerusalem. The villagers sing, “Jerusalem, you are our destiny—the place where our dreams lie.” But, upon landing, James finds himself in contemporary Israel instead of a land flowing with milk and honey. 

 

Upon arrival at the airport, James is stopped. Interrogated by a cynical immigration agent (Yael Leventhal), who mocks James’ naivety, not believing for a moment that James is a pilgrim. Instead suspects him of being an illegal worker. Played comically by the actress, her character silences James repeatedly – refusing to hear his pleas, to believe his dreams. No Jerusalem for James – James is sent to jail. 

 

She is doing a good thing – right? An honorable thing. She is clearing the street of undesirables – of the “Africans” people who have come to Israel to steal our jobs. Take food out of our children’s mouths. Disrespect the country that our grandfathers and grandmothers sacrificed so much for. It’s her job to tell him the truth. To wake him up. 

 

I mean, why else is he here – you can imagine, she asks herself. What could be here – everyone we know – at least the smart ones that we know are trying to leave – are trying to check out of the country, not check in. Silicon Valley, New York, LA, Miami, not Jerusalem. Their money grows on trees. There is the opportunity – not here – not in this cramped office – with yellowing posters of travel destinations. What could James possibly want here? Israel is a wasteland – a swap filled with malaria. Surrounded by dangerous enemies, the Arabs. 

 

And this is just the beginning. Like Abraham before him, James faces test after test. 

 

Test After Test

Shimi (Salim Daw), a contractor of foreign workers, releases him on bail to work with him. However, after James explains that he did not travel to Israel to work, Shimi clarifies that since he paid for his release, James now owes him. So, James interrupts his journey to work for Shimi. 

 

Shimi tries to gain a profit at James’ expense and makes him work for other people as well, and Shimi’s wife sees him as a kind of amusement. Salah, Shimi’s father, soon discovers that James is exceptionally lucky rolling dice, and he decides to exploit this to win in backgammon games against his friends. James hopes to pay his debt to Shimi so he can finally reach Jerusalem, but as time passes, he learns how to conduct with the locals. Salah keeps telling good-hearted and guileless James, “Don’t be a frayer (sucker),” Eventually, James ceases to be one.

 

Stop: This Movie is Racist

At this point in the movie, one of my classmates stood up, frustrated, “why are we watching this movie? This is making fun of my Iraqi family members.” Such classmate is the friend (if I may be so bold as to actually call him that) that often encourages me, similar to the fictional character of Salah, to not be a “frayarit,” to stand up for myself, fight back, and say no, stop being so nice. So interested, stop caring so much. He was the one that cheered me on after I stood up to the class bully at 2 am, after working on the set for 18+ hours- and said “enough” and got in my car and drove away – good, he cheered. You won’t get by in this society by acting like a frayer- if you want respect – you have to earn it – how does one achieve it – by standing up for themselves. So see, you don’t have to take it – good for you – don’t let people take advantage of you. 

 

Another classmate taught me the art of “minimum al haminimum” stop jumping up – stop seeing what needs to be done and doing it. Who cares? It’s not your problem – let him figure it out. Tafkidim Achi, another phrase thrown around in film school, stay in your lane. That’s not your problem. Don’t worry about others – worry about yourself. Bekitzur (in short), you are a friar(it), and friarits won’t succeed here. The only way to grow (to survive?) -is to be like us.

 

Are You A Frayer?

Director  Ra’anan Alexandrowicz, in an interview with Liza Bear , explains that James, “… symbolizes for me our confusion with ourselves at the moment. It’s about this concept of frayer, a Yiddish slang word for a sucker. I think it comes from German, actually. Salah is teaching James not to be a frayer—to be strong, to not let go of anything—just as he did his own son. But afterward, his sons—his real son and his adopted son, James—turn against him, and Salah finds himself in a weak position with them. At one point, James tells him, “Look, you can get a million dollars for your plot of land. Why don’t you take it? Don’t be a frayer. Take it.” It’s the other way around now. But Salah thinks, “If I take the money, I’m frayer. What do I gain from it?” 

 

This is perhaps something the Israeli consciousness should understand: that now we are trapped. Perhaps our way out is through being precisely the opposite of what we believe—the opposite of being strong. So yes. James changes into someone who won’t be a frayer anymore, then makes enemies and hurts others. But then, at the film’s end, he wakes up and finds who he was and what he is now. And this is something that I hope for us very much.

 

When you look at the political problems in my country, we’ve been trying to solve them for decades by not being anyone’s ‘frayer.’ It’s not working out for us. In the long term, it doesn’t work for any society. You make some short-term benefits, but in the long term, you pay a high price for not being a ‘frayer.”

 

For James and I and other Pilgrims, there is no shortage of tests as we journey to Jerusalem. We left it all, our homeland, our families, our material comforts, for the Promised Land. And like the spies in the desert, we see it all. You’re not in Kansas anymore, Dorothy. 

 

We get it. James got it. 

 

Soon, he, too, discovered that to survive, he couldn’t beat them. James must join them. So, he starts managing his foreign worker friends and soon becomes a cheap labor contractor like Shimi. James buys himself nice clothes, a mobile phone, and a TV. As a result, he forgets about the pilgrimage. Eventually, James remembers the original reason for arriving in Israel, but it is already too late – he is arrested by the immigration police and transferred to an Israeli prison. The prison is located in the Russian Compound in Jerusalem, so as he is handcuffed, James finally gets to see the city to which his village prays.

 

The Audience Responds

James’ Journey to Jerusalem, received critical acclaim both in Israel and abroad. A winner of the Cannes Film Festival in 2003, the Toronto International Film Festival in 2003, London Film Festival in 2003; Jerusalem International Film Festival in 2003 (Special Jury Prize; Best Actor Prize); and many more. 

 

The audience finds it very amusing, his corruption, his accommodation to the system. But his change is necessary to a certain extent because we don’t live in imaginary villages. 

 

Robert Colson, an assistant professor of interdisciplinary humanities at Brigham Young University International Cinema, said that the movie “takes what seems like a light-hearted approach to a serious topic. James goes through much of the movie with a naïve hope and a belief that what he’s going to find will meet his expectations despite the reality he faces. On the one hand, we see this Pilgrim’s view – a hope to find something. On the other hand, the film shows us the reality of things. It takes James a while to see the truth of his situation: detention, racism, manipulation, and language and cultural barriers. The film shows, through a migrant youth, the contrast between the disparity of what one hopes to happen and the reality of experience.”

 

Like James, I, too, experienced the disparity between what I hoped to happen and the reality of the experience. For thirteen years, I have been absorbed into this foreign culture – a culture quite different than the one for which my younger self prayed, hoped, and yearned. This Pilgrim refuses to give up.  This Pilgrim’s journey continues towards Jerusalem.

 

Director Ra’anan Alexandrowicz, admits that “Some levels of the film may not be easily understood outside Israel. For instance, James’s most substantial connection in the movie is with Salah, his boss Shimi’s father; Salah’s character is an homage to a character in an old Israeli film, Salah Shabati(1963), who’s a Moroccan Jew. Salah is an Arabic name. In my movie, the actor who plays the part, Arie Elias, emigrated from Iraq in 1950. He knew how to do Shakespeare in Arabic. Once in Israel, Elias’s status as an actor was denied because, at the time, Arabic was not accepted as a cultural language. So Arie had a challenging time immigrating to Israel. And the character he’s playing also has this history for Israelis. So the old immigrant from 50 years ago is now teaching the new immigrant— James represents the development of the Israeli dream, how we came with very idealistic and pure dreams, about how we were going to develop ourselves as a country. And somehow, on the way to making these dreams come true, he loses his way. James is no longer dreaming of Jerusalem but of a new television. But he’s still talking about Jerusalem. So he symbolizes for me our confusion with ourselves at the moment.”

 

Who She Was and Who She Is Now

We, Pilgrims, recognize the conflict. We, Pilgrims, internalize the dichotomy. We Pilgrims try to fit in. We, Pilgrims, are desperate to fit in. Yes. We understand that change is necessary. That absorption into a foreign culture is predicated upon internal and external strength. 

 

We Pilgrims recognize that we must never forget the genesis of our pilgrimage and have the power and conviction to continue.

 

I am James and James is me.

We Journey to Jerusalem

 

Title: James’ Journey to Jerusalem

Year: 2003

Genre: Comedy, Drama

Director: Ra’anan Alexandrowicz

Writers: Ra’anan Alexandrowicz and Sami Duenias

Stars: Siyabonga Melongisi Shibe, Salim Daw, Arieh Elias

Original Score: Ehud Banai; Gil Smetana; Noam Halevi

Cinematography: Shark De Mayo

Editors: Ron Goldman

 

Filed Under: Blog, FIlm Reviews, Jerusalem Tagged With: jerusalem, movie, pilgrim

Ghost: A Film Analysis

January 20, 2022 by Yocheved Feinerman Leave a Comment

Ghost: Film Analysis

Let’s breakdown the movie Ghost with Save the Cat

What!

You haven’t read the world’ #1 Storyteller Method?

STOP READING THIS BLOG.

You must learn the Basics of Story Structure

How to Plot and Develop Your Screenplay, Novel, and TV Series with the #1 Storytelling Guide

Click here to read about Save the Cat

or

Click here to Watch Blake Snyder’s Save the Cat

WELCOME BACK

Let’s breakdown the movie Ghost using Blake Snyder’s story structure.

Movie: Ghost

Director: Jerry Zucker

Screenwriter: Bruce Joel Rubin

Year: 1990

Genre: Superhero

The key here is a nemesis and problem that is seemingly bigger than they are. 

 

Logline: A murdered man’s ghost must find a way to warn the woman he loves that she is in danger… before she becomes a murder victim as well. 

 


  1. Opening Image (1):

Gray, dusty, abandoned room, wires hanging from the ceiling

clouds of moving dust. Muted light pierce the dense atmosphere. An eeriness envelops us. Strange ghostly forms appear and disappear in the distance. Broken timbers and dangling cables emerge from the smoky light. We see hints of a vast demolished space. An old white plaster wall.

 


  1. Theme Stated (5):

Love never dies.

Molly comments about “the space” Sam asks, “what will we do with the space?” (when we leave space in our heart – we love – love never dies)

 


  1. Set-Up (1-10):

Sam Wheat and Molly Jenson are a couple in love. Well – in love- without Sam saying the words “I love you,” preferring to respond to Molly’s statement with a “ditto.” Together, and with the help of Sam’s business partner, Carl, they are renovating a loft. Unfortunately, Sam is preoccupied with a financial conundrum. Which affects him both at work and at home. Soon after delving into the finances, Sam is murdered and becomes a ghost. This effectively destroys his initial Normal World.

 


  1. Catalyst (12):

Sam is murdered by Willie Lopez. Sam dies in Molly’s arms. 

 


  1. Debate (12-25):

Should Sam head towards the light – heaven, or should he stay as a ghost with Molly?

 


  1. Break into Two (25): 

Sam is worried that Willie Lopez is going to murder Molly.

 


  1. B Story (30):

Sam finds himself in a new world – the world of a ghost.

 


  1. Fun and Games (30-55):

Sam must learn the rules and how to adapt to the new world. He is mentored by an Emergency Room Ghost, who introduces him to the new world’s in’s and out’s. Sam meets the psychic Oda Mae and realizes she can hear him. Launching a series of reactions from Sam and Oda Mae as they try to negotiate their new relationship —and Sam’s need to protect Molly. 

 

From a loud-mouthed New York City subway poltergeist (Vincent Schiavelli), Sam learns the skills needed to move objects using only his mental powers. Sam convinces Oda Mae to end Carl’s money laundering scheme by impersonating Carl’s fake bank account owner. She withdraws the balance and closes the account with an invisible Sam behind her, donating the money to a homeless shelter.

 


  1. Midpoint (55):

Molly goes to the police and asks about Ode Mae. She is told over and over. Oda Mae is a con (wo)man trying to cheat Molly. There is no such thing as a psychic. That Molly is not communicating with Sam. Afterward, Sam and Oda Mae return to Molly’s apartment to warn about Carl. Molly refuses to open the door – and is lost in her grief.  

LOVE DIES

 


  1. Bad Guys Close In (55-75):

When Oda Mae learns the name of Sam’s killer., she is afraid and refuses to help Sam.  

 


  1. All Is Lost (75):

Sam discovers the man behind his murder –  his best friend, Carl. 

 


  1. Dark Night of the Soul (75-85):

Carl threatens to kill Molly if Carl and Oda Mae don’t return the money. 

 


  1. Break into Three (85):

Sam enters the apartment. He instructs Oda Mae to push a penny under the front door. In front of Molly, Sam lifts the penny into the air. 

 

A shocked Molly realizes the truth and lets Ode Mae inside. 

After Ode Mae calls the police, she allows Sam to possess her body, permitting him and Molly to share a dance. For the last time.


  1. Finale (85-110)

Gather the Team 

Carl arrives intending to murder Molly and Oda Mae. They run away. Sam is left weak by the possession, and Molly and Oda Mae are left alone against Carl. 

Executing the Plan

After evading Carl for a brief time, Carl seizes Oda Mae. At gunpoint. He threatens her, demanding the money. Molly comes to Oda Mae’s rescue. She is pushed aside. As a recovered Sam arrives to help. CArl throws a scaffolding hook in Sam’s direction, which swings back and shatters the window, which Carl was attempting to escape. Impaling him through the chest. 

Carl morphs into a ghost, astonishing and paining Sam. Sam watches in silence as the shadowy demons arrive and drag a screaming Carl away into the darkness.

High Tower Surprise

As Sam returns, Molly suddenly realizes that she can hear him. 

Dig Deep Down

A heavenly light fills the room, making Sam fully visible to Molly and Oda Mae. Sam turns and sees hundreds of people standing behind him, waiting for him. Finally, Sam realizes his task is complete. It is time to move on.

Execute the New Plan

Sam thanks Oda Mae for her help, then Sam professes both his everlasting love and his goodbyes to Molly.


  1. Final Image (110):

Sam departs to the afterlife – neon/rainbow-colored light.

LOVE NEVER DIES.

Filed Under: Blog, FIlm Reviews, Film School

Meet the Parents: A Film Review

January 17, 2022 by Yocheved Feinerman Leave a Comment

The "Jew" in Film

Movies: Meet the Parents (2004) Greg Says Grace and Meet the Fockers (2006) Foreskin Fondue

What Makes a Film Feel Jewish?

Although some Jewish films reference explicit Jewish themes, a Jewish movie will often have little to do with religion. Instead, Jewishness in films is defined by a social atmosphere, thematically represented as being 

outside. Or Jewishness in film can be recognized by a certain cadence in the dialogue. Audiences respond to these elements recognizing the film as something that feels Jewish. 

 

The “neurotic nebbish” term had been applied to the Zionist-era Muscle Jew and to the more romantically appealing, conspicuously Jewish actors such as Dustin Hoffman, Barbra Streisand, and Woody Allen. 

 

The “Other” in Film

What Created the Jewish Persona?

For decades Jews were barred from many aspects of American life, most notoriously from many Waspy country clubs. Resulting in humor attesting to their role as outsiders looking in. 

 

Characters in movies and television maintained strong religious beliefs, language, and vibrant theater life. Like many other immigrant groups, American Jews maintained a distance from mainstream American life. Perhaps, a result of mainstream American life keeping their distance from them. Marx, Lenny Bruce, Rodney Dangerfield, and Allen developed their comedic careers. “I can’t get no respect!” Dangerfield’s famous line illustrates how many Jewish comedians felt about their place in society.

 

The “Neurotic Nebbish” in Film

How were Jewish fathers portrayed?

 

Jewish fathers on the big screen, Eugene Levy, in American Pie or Chaim Topol’s Tevye are often portrayed as neurotic and controlling, often with a desire to be more. Whereas portrayals of Jewish mothers usually focus on pushiness and bossiness.

 

Jack, the WASP, is a jerk. Greg, the Jew, is a schlemiel. The schlemiel wins. Greg can be considered a postmodern schlemiel. Although he attributes the stereotypical nerdy fumbler, “American society now identifies with him.” Non-Jews and Jews feel unsettled and do not identify with all-powerful characters, like Rambo; instead, they are drawn to anxious and insecure people like Greg, whose warmth, decency, and caring attract Pam.

 

The “Super Jew” in Film

How did Woody Allen evolve into Ben Stiller?

 

Similar to other immigrant communities, Jewish Americans assimilated into the cultural norm. By leaving their tenant neighborhoods and moving to the suburbs, Jewish families, absorbed into the culture, losing their Yiddish accents, loosening the strictures of faith, and frequently inter-marrying.

 

The landscape of New York has undergone significant changes since Woody Allen began filming on the streets. But, more importantly, so has the role of Jewish life in American popular culture. For over forty years, Woody Allen’s cinematic alter egos. Filmed with angst and fear, archetypes detailing the fears and hopes of a self-doubting Jew in Manhattan. 

 

These archetypes seem less relevant to modern audiences. In contrast to Allen’s characters, Young Jews place in American life seems secure and prosperous. Today’s Jews are becoming more and more potent in American popular culture, specifically in comedic films. Today’s success has less to do with their “outsider” status and is more connected to their talent. 

 

The Jewish publisher at Heeb, Josh Neuman, says that Woody Allen’s comedic style is cringe-worthy. “Allen has been a huge influence for what he has done, but he is addressing the concerns of another era.” 

 

Modern audiences relate to the next generation of filmmakers and actors, like Adam Sandler and Ben Stiller.

 

Ben Stiller is an American actor, comedian, and filmmaker. The son of Jerry Stiller, a comedian, an actor from a Jewish family that emigrated from Poland and Galicia in Eastern Europe. His mother, actress/comedian Anne Meara (1929-2015), converted to Reform Judaism from an Irish Catholic background. The Stiller’s not a particularly religious family, celebrated Hanukkah and Christmas, and Stiller celebrated his Bar Mitzvah.

 

Ben Stiller became known for playing the hapless romantic leading man, as he did in There’s Something About Mary and Keeping the Faith. In Meet the Parents and the sequel, Meet the Fockers, Stiller plays a neurotic, Jewish male nurse named Greg Focker.

 

In casting Ben Stiller as Greg, Director Jay Roach was impressed with Stiller’s creative and improvisational abilities and neurotic persona. “I saw Meet the Parents as an anxiety dream, and in my view, nobody plays that kind of material better than Ben.” 

 

The “Meeting of the Other’ in Film

“Meet The Parents” stands out as a classic send-up of embarrassing Jewish parents, right down to the awkward name. Played by Jewish actors Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand, the Fockers in question tell embarrassing stories, keep embarrassing pictures, and even preserve their son’s foreskin.

How do audiences relate to Greg Focker? 

The movie juxtaposes Greg Focker as a middle-class Jewish nurse against the Byrnes family of upper-class White Anglo-Saxon Protestants. Concerning Greg as a Jew and a nurse, a distinct cultural gap is created and subsequently widened compared to the Byrnes and Banks families. The cultural differences are often highlighted, and Greg is repeatedly made aware of them. This serves to achieve the comedic effect through character development and has also been commented upon as indicative of thematic portrayal of Jewish characters’ roles in the modern film and being a prime example of how male nurses are portrayed in media. 

 

Greg says Grace: A Focus on the Scene

Movie: Meet the Parents

Director: Jay Roach

Year: 2000

Synopsis: Before proposing, Greg Focker meets his girlfriend’s parents, but her suspicious father is every date’s worst nightmare.

Scene: Greg is Jewish 

Greg Says, Grace

 

Pressured into reciting “Grace” by the Christian host, an apprehensive and unskilled Jewish Greg, concedes to reciting a prayer blessing the food at the dinner table. Unsure of what he is supposed to do, Greg improvises and recites a part of Godspell. This scene highlights Greg’s broad social and cultural gap and the WASP Christian family.

 

Mealtimes often portray Jewish characters as part of the broader movement she believes started in the 1960s when filmmakers began producing work exploring the “Jewish self-definition.” 

 

The dinner table morphs into a place where Jewish characters conflict with their ethnic and sexual personas. This is evident in the scene where Greg sits down for dinner with the Byrnes family and is asked to recite grace over the food. Instead, Greg attempts to recite a prayer and improvises, launching into a “Day by Day” recital from Act I of Godspell. Highlighting the cultural distance between the Jewish Greg and the Christian Byrnes. The social gap is further widened the following day when Greg is the last person to show up at breakfast. Worse, he arrives at the table wearing pajamas while everyone is fully clothed. Furthermore, Greg eats a bagel, a clear sign of his Jewishness.

 

How do audiences relate to Streisand and Hoffman? 

Greg’s parents, Bernie and Roz, are modern traditional stereotypes. Roz, a sex therapist, recalls Dr. Ruth Westheimer. Instead of being overbearing, overachieving, and materialistic, Roz is a caring mother, interested in her son’s relationships, including details of his sex life.

 

Bernie, the image of a highly involved Jewish father, gave up his legal career to become a stay-at-home, is most proud of how Greg pursues his own goals, not someone else’s. The Fockers sprinkle Yiddish into their conversation, show off their scrapbook displaying Greg’s foreskin, and embarrass their son by talking too much about sex, but they are open and humane. Their frailties are not humiliating but humanizing, making them representatives of the new multiculturalism. 

 

Pam’s parents are initially shocked by Roz, but they too triumph by demonstrating their humanity like Greg. When Jack can turn to Roz for assistance at the end of “Meet the Fockers,” he has been “fockerized.” The Fockers films capture how “Jews have become more American, and America has become more Jewish.”

 

Focus on a Scene

Movie: Meet The Fockers

Director: Jay Roach

Year: 2006

Synopsis: 

The Byrnes family meets the Focker family. 

Scene: Foreskin Fondue

 

Meet the Fockers ends with the main character noting that the uptight paranoid and decidedly “unJewish” Jack Byrnes (Robert De Niro) has been “Fockerized.” In other words, the Focker family has made Jack cool. The Fockers, Ben Stiller, Dustin Hoffman, Barbra Streisand are the good guys in this movie, the hip characters, the anti-shylocks, the Jews happy to be Jews, as opposed to Woody Allen’s character Zelig (Zelig, 1983). Unlike past families reticent over their overt Jewish identity, the Fockers avoid referencing traditional religious practices, namely circumcision. Instead, the Fockers have preserved Gaylord’s foreskin in a scrapbook. 

 

The Stereotype of Jewishy Jews in Film

How do movies break the stereotype?

Roz and Bernie are none of these stereotypes. For starters, Greg’s dad Bernie is a former lawyer who actually retired to be a stay-at-home dad, and Roz is a sex therapist. This gorgeous couple rejects the gender roles prevalent in traditionally depicted Jewish marriages on the big screen. In addition, they aren’t uptight, neurotic, or conservative. Instead, here they are seen as liberal, with hippie sensibilities. 

 

Roz and Bernie are Jewish and proud. Flaunting natural curls, Roz is exceptionally loving to Bernie, embarrassing Greg, showing audiences that they are having more fun than the repressed Byrnes. The trampling over and ignoring boundaries is incredibly Jewish but filled with warmth and joy.

 

Instead of being angry that their son is intermarrying, Bernie and Roz embrace Greg’s bride. Thrilled that Greg and Pam have found each other — a powerful sentiment from an older Jewish couple. They are liberal in both their politics and Jewishness. Jewish parents on-screen are often portrayed as disliking and being disappointed in their children. The Fockers are proud of their child, even displaying Greg’s 9th place trophies. 

 

How do the movies reinforce the stereotypes?

The changing role of Jews in American culture is portrayed in both movies. Jews, previously characterized as outsiders of mainstream culture. Continuing the anti-semitic tradition, questioning Jewish maleness, frequent jokes poke fun, implying masculinity. Is different from the norm. They are neurotic, weak, and effeminate—a continuation of the anti-Semitic tradition that questioned Jewish maleness, with their portrayal as caricatures.

 

Greg does not face outright Anti-Semisitism, but it is clear that Greg himself “feels out of place” in a WASP world.

 

The emasculation of the Jewish Male in Film

In both films, Greg’s manhood is attacked by Jack. 

 

Greg’s profession as a nurse is a running gag throughout the movie. Brought up by Jack in a negative context. And the character of Greg Focker has come to be one of the best-known film portrayals of a male nurse. Though males dominated the profession in earlier times, there has been a feminization of the nursing profession for the last century, which has caused men in nursing to often be portrayed as misfits by the media. Jack often criticizes Greg’s career choice per his perception of nursing being an effeminate profession. 

 

The Fockerization in Film

How have the Focker movies influenced American society?

“Meet the Parents” and “Meet the Fockers” exemplify the fact that today’s Jewish Jew is no longer avoided and less often portrayed as a stereotype. Both movies depict an evolution in film from the de-ethnicized Jew to characters flaunting Jewishness in a Christian-centric society. 

 

The Post-Modern Schlemiels in Film

How different are the personas of Woody Allen and Ben Stiller?

It is clear from researching this article, in connection with our class lessons, that the Jewish presence is still a phenomenon in films. Despite the modernization of society, the assimilation, the archetypal Jewish male can be watched at the movies, on television sets, on streamers, on phones, on the internet. Woody Allen and Ben Stiller have much in common as schlemiels.

 

Articles Referenced

Woody’s back in New York. But this is a very different Manhattan

Boy-man Schlemiels and Super-Nebbishes: Adam Sandler and Ben Stiller

Schlemiel in Theory

iMBD

The Evolution of Jews In American Film

 

 

Filed Under: Blog, FIlm Reviews, Film School

The SOPHOMORE

October 7, 2021 by Yocheved Feinerman Leave a Comment

The SOPHOMORE

Old School

Year Two is starting. Would I even be able to recognize the Yocheved that signed up for a four-year film school degree, with a focus on production, all in Hebrew, without reading the fine print – yes, it is all in Hebrew. But, what about… there are no buts. Yes, the focus is production. Yes, your classmates – have actual experience using a camera. A REAL camera. Editing software. They like building the pieces of equipment that remind me of Tinkertoys – I never played with tinker toys + and my classmates never even heard of Tinkertoys. Note to self: jokes don’t transfer well into Hebrew. Or into millennial vernacular. 

You like me. You really like me. – Sally Field.

Well, some do. 

Baruch Hashem! I made a few friends. 

Two successful directorial projects + one ok project + one that didn’t turn out the way I wanted or needed. Yes, I am still frustrated. But, yes – the project continues. 

Boom

Learned from Devaria – the yoga expert, how to position my body to be a functional boom operator. 

And costume design — who knew years and years of judging your outfits and bags – could be channeled into a job. A job that requires shopping!!!

איזה קטע

American Sophomore

Yes. it’s a real movie — no, I never saw it. So, no, I don’t think I will review it.

In a few days, I’m headed back to M’aale – this time as a relaxed and confident Sophomore. Well – I have picked up a few acting skills. 

The instructions are clear- up my Hebrew game – קבלתי

And the advice (directive) to talk less and do more. What I don’t understand. That’s strike one. 

I hear you – I understand where you are coming from. Thanks, Brene.

Student of the Year

What! Am I not student of the year?

After much thought – more accurately, much sulking – much self-inquiry into why everyone isn’t madly in love with me. Why am I not an expert on the technical side? Why does no one understand me? What the F**&*K is a shooting script?

I decided to follow their advice – the Yocheved way.

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

#GOWITHYO

It’s time to blog. To share with you the ups and downs of filmmaking. Behind the scenes. On location. The challenge. The rewards. The soul. The passion.

I want to introduce you to incredible people that I get to work with – those whose names are in boldface and those that will be in boldface.

As well as reviewing movies!

Spoiler Alert: the film is a highly intentional art form, and everything is on the screen and on the soundtrack for a reason. Everything was chosen because it “reads” and contributes to the meaning in some way.

As a budding director, I want to understand as thoroughly as possible cinematic language. How has it evolved? How is it currently practiced? Always thinking about how I might be able to employ or expand this to suit my dramatic needs. My goal is to analyze films in terms of narrative, emotions, and themes and know HOW the films convey all this meaning.

For those that have had the pleasure of sitting in a dark movie theater with me or on the couch in a not-so-dark living room – you know you can’t get me to shut up.

The challenge in this upcoming series of blogs is knowing how.

On the Basis of Sex

Get ready to watch or rewatch and analyze. Yes, most of the films chosen resonate with my particular style – or a current project I am working on. 

Expect to see a lot of female-driven choices.

Student films.

Short films.

Jewish-themed films.

Israeli films.

Israeli directors.

Best if an Israeli female director!

Films from #TheList – you know, movies all of us should have watched, and if we didn’t see, we MUST watch. 

Analyze This

Join me in uncovering the subtleties and complexities of the film’s artistic design – likely not evident to the average viewer – and are essential to how the film actually works and communicates meaning.

So yes – there will be spoilers! There will be some shop talk. But rest assured- there will be plenty of character analysis. I hope you will share your thoughts and impressions. And we can engage in meaningful conversations. Those juicy talks – the ones there are never enough time for On-Set or even in the classroom.

Focus

Cinematography

Editing

Sound design

Art direction

Understanding their specific contribution to the film and how they work in coordination- telling a complete and complex narrative.

Breakdown

Step One: Watch the entire movie — no notes.

Step Two: Write down first impressions – ideas for what the film is all about and the overall tone.

Step Three: Define the core idea behind the film

Step Four: Watch a movie again.

Step Five: Break down the movie in terms of what we can learn/understand in each scene in sequence – tone, plot, character, theme.

Step Six: What do I understand?

Step Seven: rewatch scenes – to discover how film language conveyed that meaning to me. We will break down the cinematic storytelling elements (editing, camera work, art direction, sound design, music, etc.), considering them in isolation.

Analyze That

How does the technique (editing, camera work, art direction, sound design, music) contribute to what is being expressed (theme, tone, narrative detail, character, exposition, mood)

What are the reasons the filmmakers might have chosen this particular technique – rather than another?

Connotations and denotation of each individual shot

Details with the mise-en-scene

When the composition on screen is adjusted because of changing internal elements

Conscious of the layering in the movie soundtrack

My favorite — metaphors or symbols — analyzing how they can be truly organic to the situation- rather than imposed. 

Scene transitions – time transitions

The compositional relationship between adjacent shots (cut, dissolve, or otherwise associated together.

An accomplished director handles the axis – particularly crossing the scene axis: subject to subject and observer to subject.

Lights – and lighting – and their emotional association.

We believe the core idea at the film’s heart is how the cinematic language most effectively and eloquently expresses that.

Burn After Reading 

Send me your favorite movies — I’ll add them to the list. 

 

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: #filmreview, filmstudent

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Footer

Talk to me.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About Yo
    • Portfolio
    • Say Hello

Copyright © 2025 · Wellness Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in